The Impact of Adaptive Learning Based on Artificial Intelligence on Elementary School Students' Mathematics Learning Motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62945/etnopedagogi.v3i3.872Keywords:
Adaptive learning, artificial intelligence, mathematics learning motivationAbstract
This research aims to examine the effect of artificial intelligence-based adaptive learning on elementary school students' mathematics learning motivation. This research is quantitative research with the type of experimental research. The experimental design used was a quasi experiment involving class 4a students at SD Negeri Cileungsir as the experimental class (30 students) and class 4b students at SD Negeri Cileungsir as the control class (30 students). This research data is quantitative data collected using questionnaire techniques. The collected data was then analyzed using descriptive statistical test techniques by testing individual acquisition values and classical averages. Individual and classical scores are then interpreted based on the categorization table. Next, the data were analyzed using inferential statistical test techniques using independent t-tests and paired t-tests. The research results show that adaptive learning based on artificial intelligence has a positive and significant effect on elementary school students' mathematics learning motivation. This is evident from research data which shows that there was a significant increase in the average score of students' mathematics learning motivation in the experimental class between before and after being given treatment, namely from 62.34 (low category) to 90.78 (very high category). Furthermore, the average posttest score for students' mathematics learning motivation in the experimental class showed 90.78 (very high category), while in the control class it was 67.12 (low category). This means that the mathematics learning motivation of students who use artificial intelligence-based adaptive learning is better. Inferential statistical tests were carried out in this study to test the research hypothesis. The results of the prerequisite tests are used as a basis for continuing hypothesis testing using parametric statistical techniques using the t-test type. The results of the independent t-test and paired t-test show that the significance value is smaller than the alpha value, namely 0.000 (<0.005). Based on these results, adaptive learning based on artificial intelligence can be used as an alternative to overcome the low motivation to learn mathematics in elementary school students.
Downloads
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V. C., & Siemens, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review and future agenda. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100157
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2018). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 00149. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12514
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Rapor pendidikan Indonesia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S141421
Ma, W., Adesope, O. O., Nesbit, J. C., & Liu, Q. (2021). Intelligent tutoring systems and learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000423
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020
Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2022). Emotions in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 54, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01306-6
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Personalization in learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 55(3), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1724842
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arwasih, Andika Arisetyawan, Andhin Dyas Fitriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
