Effectivity of Virtual Field Trip-Based Learning on Elementary School Students' Scientific Literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62945/ijesh.v3i2.865Keywords:
Virtual field trips, scientific literacy, elementary education, quasy-experimental, educational technologyAbstract
Developing scientific literacy in elementary education is critical, yet traditional classroom methods often struggle to foster high engagement and contextual understanding, particularly in resource-limited settings. While digital interventions are rising, the specific efficacy of virtual field trips (VFT) in transformative science learning remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to examine the effect of virtual field trip-based learning on elementary school students' scientific literacy. Utilizing a quantitative quasi-experimental design, this study involved 60 fifth-grade students, divided equally into an experimental class (utilizing VFT) and a control class (traditional instruction). Data were collected through a structured scientific literacy questionnaire and analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically paired and independent sample t-tests. The findings indicate that VFT-based learning exerts a positive and highly significant effect on students' scientific literacy. The experimental group exhibited a remarkable increase in mean scientific literacy scores, soaring from 60.63 (low category) pre-treatment to 92.18 (very high category) post-treatment. Conversely, the control group only achieved a post-test mean of 67.16 (low category), demonstrating that VFT integration yields significantly superior outcomes compared to conventional methods (p < 0.05). Consequently, VFT-based learning serves as a potent pedagogical alternative to mitigate low scientific literacy. Beyond individual score gains, these insights offer a scalable framework for curriculum developers to integrate immersive digital technologies into early science education, bridging the gap between abstract scientific concepts and real-world phenomena.
Downloads
References
Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Friedman, T. (2018). Scientific literacy and student attitudes toward science. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90850-0
Behrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2019). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245.
Bybee, R. W. (2018). STEM education now more than ever. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2018). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562
Fosnot, C. T. (2018). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-04189-9
Gilbert, J. K. (2016). Science education through contexts: Is it worth the effort? Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-684-8
Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Kuo, H. C., Tseng, Y. C., & Yang, Y. T. C. (2022). Promoting scientific inquiry through immersive virtual learning environments. Computers & Education, 184, 104518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104518
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2020). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2019). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.19784
López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigComp framework: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5583
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive and affective educational benefits of immersive virtual reality in science education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1531–1562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09590-8
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355
Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K–12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2023). PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
National Research Council. (2018). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2019). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 545–558). New York, NY: Routledge.
Spector, J. M. (2020). Learning, design, and technology: An international compendium of theory, research, practice, and policy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-2
Thomas, G. P., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. M. (2021). Development of scientific literacy through contextualized science learning. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09872-8
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2021). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(2), 189–199.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.
Van Meter, P., Firetto, C. M., & Mason, L. (2020). Scientific literacy and evidence-based reasoning in elementary science education. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1783671
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2019). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
Yoon, S. A., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Elinich, K. (2020). How augmented reality enables conceptual understanding in science education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1261–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09700-8
Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z., & Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through virtual field trips in K–12 education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3277–3298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09802-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marpian, Wahyu Sopandi, Yulianti Fitriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
