The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Elementary School Students' Reading Literacy: An Experimental Research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v3i2.861

Keywords:

Digital storytelling, reading literacy, elementary school, multimedia learning, quantitative experiment

Abstract

In the digital era, cultivating early reading literacy requires innovative pedagogical approaches that move beyond traditional print-based methods. While digital storytelling has emerged as a promising tool, empirical evidence regarding its specific efficacy in primary school settings remains limited. This study aims to examine the effect of digital storytelling on the reading literacy of elementary school students. Utilizing a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design, this research involved 36 students from SD Negeri Kalibuntu, who were divided into an experimental group and a control group. Data on students' reading literacy were systematically gathered using structured observation techniques. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics evaluating individual acquisition scores and classical averages based on a categorization table and inferential parametric statistics via independent and paired-sample t-tests.The findings demonstrated that digital storytelling exerts a highly positive and statistically significant effect on elementary school students' reading literacy. This is evidenced by a substantial increase in the experimental group's average literacy score from a pre-test baseline of 60.17 (low category) to a post-test peak of 92.34 (very high category). Furthermore, the experimental group's post-test literacy score (M = 92.34) significantly outperformed the control group (M = 65.61, low category), with inferential analysis confirming a high statistical significance (p < 0.000). These results indicate that integrating multimedia narratives enhances cognitive engagement and textual comprehension in young learners. Consequently, this study underscores that digital storytelling serves as a potent pedagogical alternative to mitigate low reading literacy, offering critical insights for primary school educators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_29

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Rapor pendidikan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbudristek.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, United Kingdom: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203970034

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316941355

Niemi, H., & Multisilta, J. (2016). Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1074610

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Robin, B. R. (2016). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Digital Education Review, 30, 17–29.

Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8

Smeda, N., Dakich, E., & Sharda, N. (2014). The effectiveness of digital storytelling in the classrooms: A comprehensive study. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0006-3

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Rizkiah, A., Nurulpaik, I., & Wulan, N. S. (2026). The Effect of Digital Storytelling on Elementary School Students’ Reading Literacy: An Experimental Research. Journal of Indonesian Primary School, 3(2), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v3i2.861

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.